Skip to main content

Chinese sub sinking propaganda

Chinese Sub Propaganda

The Chinese Submarine story has been gaining popularity but like most western stories about China. It's riddled with nonsense
fake news

Newest propaganda by the USA.

Apparently a Chinese sub has sunk and their evidence is a grainy image. It's funny how

The black mark shape on water matches no known Chinese nuclear subs



It has two lines in the middle and goes from thick to thin. Exactly like the crane. Almost as if it's a shadow. Look at other Cranes at top their shadows are facing same way


Like just look at the images, It's clearly just the shadow of the crane. 



https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sca_esv=1cb0409e6943169a&sxsrf=ADLYWILKaSope57uU7RUkZB4rT9kJcukiA:1737560696866&q=chinese+sub+sunk&udm=2&fbs=AEQNm0Aa4sjWe7Rqy32pFwRj0UkWd8nbOJfsBGGB5IQQO6L3JzWreY9LW7LdGrLDAFqYDH2SZRqG-RP3YkPpvhLN6mHYKJeWtsHNayaNIY6PwuUEvojTzSFovI5G6eRnO6b_cmmA6_eErezsn-bdNukWGtjepC3Dgf4rJsvZW8Mdtapla65g6xgh3nwobEQqaQ8_VClTrQUQ9tUDDTtwfERST6hNPn-lRg&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwjT4vKA1omLAxVZUkEAHdbjL7AQtKgLegQIFhAB#vhid=y2lZumCEkflirM&vssid=mosaic 


Better view in link 


by Zooming in you can literally see not only does the “sub” match up perfectly with the Cranes shadow but even has gaps in the middle where the crane has gaps. 



The fact this story got published is hilarious 

And it's only been suspected yet BBC, CNN, AP, etc. Are reporting it as fact


But ignore common sense even if it was true what does it prove? How do they know it was an accident and wasn't testing out fitting systems? They don't and let's play devil's advocate so what if it did ? Accidents happen.


If you think this means their navy is bad or poorly built then you are wrong


Source ?


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/22/world/europe/ship-dock-edinburgh-scotland.html 


https://www.postandcourier.com/news/death-at-detyens-shipyards-is-third-fatal-accident-on-same-us-navy-ship/article_54b29f70-825d-11ee-9cbc-27ead698a7d5.html 


https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/07/18/us-navy-orders-to-general-dynamics-nassco-to-stop-work-after-fire-on-uss-kearsarge/ 


https://time.com/4148530/navy-ship-breaks-down/ 


https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-07-11-mn-439-story.html 


https://turnstiletours.com/worst-accidents-in-the-history-of-the-brooklyn-navy-yard/ 


https://news.usni.org/2019/03/30/destroyer-struck-barge-pier-side-incident-ingalls-shipbuilding 


Or how about just new US navy ships that broke down or had failures ?


https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a20521726/americas-newest-aircraft-carrier-suffers-a-breakdown/ 


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/us-navys-most-expensive-destroyer-breaks-down-in-panama-canal 


https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/us-navy-s-next-gen-naval-warfighter-is-a-multi-billion-dollar-failure-45907 


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/04/02/us/navy-nuclear-submarine-accident-washington-state 


And if any of you are asking why the US would make up lies about china ?


https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/china-news/21091-a-500-million-dollar-business-america-s-state-sponsored-anti-china-propaganda.html 


https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/ 


https://responsiblestatecraft.org/china-cold-war-2669160202/ 


https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/12/15/china-tech-decoupling-sanctions-00071723 


https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202104/1220481.shtml 


https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-launched-cia-covert-influence-operation-against-china-2024-03-14/ 


https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202404/1310417.shtml 


https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1299139.shtml 


https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/us-house-passes--1-6-billion-to-deliver-anti-china-propagand 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Soviet Fighter Jets and their capabilities.

Russian Fighter Jets  Su-57 Felon Series  Su-57S Concept: 1998 Designed: 2004 Prototype: 2010 Completed: 2018 Production: 2021 Service: 2024 Aircraft Role: MultiRole/Air Superiority  Generation: 5th  Combat Rank: S Number Made: 60+ Su-57M Prototype: 2022 Aircraft Role: MultiRole/Air Superiority  Generation: 5+ Combat Rank: D Number Made: 1 Engines and Airframe : CAD composite construction LO Airframe with an RCS minimum of 0.01m². Crew of 1. Length 20 m. Height 4.6 m. Wingspan 14.1 m. Wing area 79 m². Frame weight 18,500 kg. Takeoff weight 40,000 kg. Max Fuel 10,300 kg. 2× Lyul'ka-Saturn AL-41-F1 low visibility 3D thrust vectoring variable bypass axial flow FADEC turbofans with supercruise with 177 kN thrust and 284 kN in afterburner. In flight refueling. Speed and Endurance:  Combat Range of 900-1300 km. Top speed of mach 2.2 to 2.4 at 15 km+, mach 2 to 2.2 at 10 km+, mach 1.8 to 2 to at 5 km+ and mach 1 to 1.3 at sea level with supercruise at ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Myths about the Su-57

  Truth about the Su-57 Felon Introduction   Okay I'm going to dispel the myth that the Su-57 isn't stealth or 5th gen. There are several parts.  Intro F-117 Incident  Stealth Technology  Top 24 Myths about Felon RCS Numbers  F22 & F35 Vs Su-57  Weaknesses of Stealth Aircraft  Conclusion  This is based on over 30 hours of research, as well as several different scattering simulations.  Sources are tied to each part instead of listed at end.  F-117 Incident The minimum RCS the SNR-125M fire control radar can lock on relative to the RCS minimum of F-117, which was 0.2m² minimum required for lock on at any distance and RCS minimum of 0.005m² means its average was likely several decimal points higher. Of Course we take into account this was old stealth technology and the fact it had cueing from P-18.  It was detected because the RCS whilst having a minimum of ~0.005m², based on the fact it's an older design and current radar sim...
Post a Comment
Read more

SMR Main Document

SERGY MILITARY RANKING'S Military Encyclopedia  Version 6 (soon to be 7)  (Updated every 30 days, correct as of 28/03/2026) Hello friends, welcome to the SMR or Sergey Military Rankings. We are the ONLY objective military analysis group. We don't shill any side and say it how it is. If you love military capabilities or want to know just how capable a country is of engaging in warfare then you've come to the right place as I guarantee this is one of the most detailed logs of military power and capabilities you've seen. Our information is free to all, our goal is to simply inform, feel free to share with anyone, our SMR is designed for all and please don't insult us because your country is lower than you thought (cough Americans, Indians and British cough) this is just our opinion and it's based on the data we've gathered. If you disagree then make your own ranking system if you think our 3-6-6 criteria isn't relevant. We Made this system becau...
Post a Comment
Read more